
Here's how the crossover board pulls out of the back of the speaker
column.
After replacing components, such as electrolytc capacitors, on the
various cards of an old Studer 2-track, I wondered if some of the
components in my loudspeaker crossovers might have aged to the point
that they were not holding their original value - such as
the capacitors. The speakers are only about 8 or 9 years old,
however. Furthermore, advances in component longevity by the time
the crossovers were assembled, had already resulted in more robust duty
cycles.
As it happens, the resistors are all the right
value
resistance, and the capacitors are all at the right capacitance,
and have very low measured ESR. However, I noticed that there
were some differences
with a single resistor on different places on the crossover
networks of the left and right channel speakers.
§ SCROLL DOWN §
This shows a pair of 100 Ohm 10 Watt resistors which are on the
right speaker's mid/tweeter crossover section. Notice how
the right resistor's leg gets wrapped around the left resistor's leg
before it goes through the through-hole. The other legs are
also wrapped together, with only one going through the other
through-hole.
In parallel, two
100 Ohm resistors equal 50 Ohms
( Rp = ______1_____)
(_____1/Ra + 1/Rb...)
On the left speaker's mid/tweeter return path, however, the right-most
100
Ohm resistor's bottom leg was either broken, or deliberately
cut, and was thereby no longer attached to the
left-most 100 Ohm resistor. Therefore, the part of the signal
that went
through this network saw twice the resistance as the other
speaker's crossover (100 Ohms insead of
50).

Believing it to have been diconnected as the result of an accidental
break, rather than a deliberate
tweak, I initially soldered a piece of resistor leg as a jumper to make
them work
in parallel. My gut feeling, however, now, after having heard it
play for a while both ways is that, D. A. L. had
determined that the right-most resistor on this particular crossover
was not needed (due to mechanical impedance issues of the tweeter
and,
possibly, mid range drivers), but, rather than deleting it, altogether,
the connection on one end was, simply, cut. Since the resistor
was already epoxied to the PCB, it would have been difficult to remove,
anyway. But the remedy they chose was just as effective.
After trying it both ways, I believe that the left loudspeaker sounds
better with the right-most resistor of the ordinarily-parallel twins
deleted. Without the notes, or an
anechoic chamber with precision meaurement microphone, signal
generator, MLSSA, and impulse spectrometry hardware, such as was
used by D. A. L., however, I would not
know as an undisputable truth what the original history of this
resisotor really was...
This picture shows the installed set
of resistors for R6, R3, R4, and R5 on the left speaker's mid/tweeter
crossover send section.
Here's how R5 looks on the
right speaker's
crossover. R5, also part of the mid/tweeter path, but in the
_send_ section, had apparently
not been installed at the factory. A cable that connects the
underneath of R5 (on the left speaker) to a nearby capacitor is instead
connected to the
bottom of R4 (which is a 51 Ohm 10 Watt resistor).
Having evaluated the performance of the loudspeakers using the
crossover as-is, and also with a 39 Ohm resistor placed in R5 on the
right channel crossover, matching the left one's configuration, I
decided that it sounded better with the R5 empty, rather than packed
(on the right speaker). Also, an article in Stereophile
magazine has an interviews of John Dunlavy, in which he explains that
his crossovers are adjusted to match the drivers (which are cherry
picked, also), after the cablinets are filled, by placing the cabinet
on a forklift and driving it just inside the anechoic
chamber, This way the phase coherence, impulse and step
response can be made as close to the design goals as possible, even
though the components, themselves, are not paricularly exotic.
The crossovers for a version 1 SC-V are visible in a D. A. L. brochure,
and there is no resistor in R5, there, either.
Please forward suggestions to andrew@serifsound.com
-Andrew